Site icon

The Department of Health and Human Services Finalizes Third Exchange Rule for 2022

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finalized the third part of the Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2022 (NBPP) this month. As the Summer Edition of Health Policy News highlighted, this this rule was expected and previewed in Part 2 of the final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameter for 2022 and was the Biden Administration’s first independent Exchange rule. The  rulemaking addresses guidance that was previously finalized by the Trump administration, and represents a reset similar to what we saw when President Trump issued the Market Stabilization Rule after entering office.

The rule was proposed in July just following the Supreme Court decision in California v. Texas upholding the Affordable Care Act. After reviewing nearly 400 comments, HHS finalized the rule on September 17, 2021.

Below are updates on the major policy changes finalized in the rule.

Exchange User Fees

The rule finalizes the increase in the 2022 Exchange User Fees to:

These amounts remain lower than the current user fees of 3 percent for FFEs and 2.5 percent for SBE-FPs. The increased fees will be used to fund enhanced outreach and enrollment and the Navigator program.

Open Enrollment Period

The rule extends the Marketplace Open Enrollment Period (OEP) starting in 2022. The OEP will again extend from November 1st through January 15th.

Direct Enrollment

The rule finalizes the proposal to repeal the Exchange Direct Enrollment option enacted via Part 1 of the NBPP. This option was slated to become available for states with State-based exchanges (SBEs) beginning in the 2022 plan year, and to FFE and SBE-FP states beginning in the 2023 plan year. States will no longer have the option to facilitate enrollment solely through a private direct enrollment entity in place of a centralized Exchange platform. No state had yet began pursuing the option. Direct enrollment as one enrollment pathway to enroll in a centralized Exchange remains an option.

Section 1332 Waiver Requirements

HHS and the Department of Treasury finalized their joint proposal to remove the enhanced flexibility relative to Section 1332 Waiver guardrails[1] enacted via Part 1 of the NBPP. The rule enacts standards similar to those put into place in 2015 and overturned via guidance in 2018.

The Departments also establish a process for waiver extensions and amendments via the rule, both of which will require a letter of intent describing proposed changes and implementation plans. Waiver extensions must be submitted at least one year prior to the waiver’s end date, and waiver amendments must be submitted at least 9 to 15 months prior to the proposed implementation date. Within 30 days of the submission, the Departments will respond to confirm that the change qualifies and identify the information that must be submitted based on the state-specific needs and requests. These requests will be subject to state and federal public comment requirements.

The rule also permanently adopts and extends flexibility related to public notice requirements in all emergency situations.

Finally, in the preamble, the Departments note that they reserve the right to further evaluate approved waivers and suspend or terminate any that they find materially fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the waiver or the guardrails, laws, and regulations.

Additional Changes

Other changes finalized in the rule include:

As we noted in our coverage of the proposed rule, HHS is still expected to make a few additional changes to reverse actions by the last administration, though – for timing reasons – it was unable to do so in this round of rule-making. Specifically:


Footnotes

[1] The Section 1332 Waiver guardrails are as follows: 1. The proposal will provide coverage that is at least as comprehensive as without the waiver; 2. The proposal will provide coverage and cost-sharing protections that are at least as affordable as without the waiver; 3. the proposal will provide coverage to at least a comparable number of the state’s residents as without the waiver; and 4. the proposal will not increase the federal deficit.

Exit mobile version